Trump’s Incoming US Cabinet & Senior Advisory Appointments backgrounder ‘ National Security’

General Mike Flynn: National Security Advisor

Flynn served as the assistant chief of staff, G2, XVIII Airborne Corps at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, from June 2001 and the director of intelligence, Joint Task Force 180 in Afghanistan until July 2002. He commanded the 111th Military Intelligence Brigade from June 2002 to June 2004.[1] He was the director of intelligence for Joint Special Operations Command from July 2004 to June 2007, with service in Afghanistan (Operation Enduring Freedom) and Iraq (Operation Iraqi Freedom). He served as the director of intelligence, United States Central Command from June 2007 to July 2008, as the director of intelligence, Joint Staff from July 2008 to June 2009, then the director of intelligence, International Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan from June 2009 to October 2010.[1][21]

220px-michael_t_flynn

In September 2011, Flynn was promoted to Lieutenant General and assigned to the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. On April 17, 2012, President Barack Obama nominated Flynn to be the 18th director of the Defense Intelligence Agency Flynn took command of the DIA in July 2012.[24] In October 2012, Flynn announced plans to release his paper “VISION2020: Accelerating Change Through Integration“, a broad look at how the Defense Intelligence Agency must transform to meet the national security challenges for the 21st Century.[25] It was meant to emphasize “integration, interagency teamwork and innovation of the whole workforce, not just the technology but the people.”

[chosen by President-elect Donald Trump on Nov. 21, 2016, to serve as National Security Adviser], was fired as head of the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) in the winter of 2014 after three decades in the military. Here he tells the real story of his departure from his post and why America is not getting any closer to winning the war on terror.

Continue reading

The Unrepentant: The Secretary of State Clinton era, Libya, and History

Hillary Clinton played a decisive role in the decision to destroy Libya’s Qaddafi regime.
Although Hillary Clinton lost her bid for the White House in part because of lingering public resentment over the 2012 terror attack that left four Americans dead in Benghazi, history will judge her even more harshly for her decisive role in the preceding U.S.-led military intervention in Libya.

09clinton-charlotte-videosmallReuters

In fact, then-Secretary of State Clinton was instrumental at three critical junctures in convincing President Obama to green-light and escalate the war to oust Libyan leader Moammar Qaddafi.

Continue reading

Clinton Secretary of State: Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood Regime nexus

As the dust of the 2016 US Presidential election settles there are emergent talking points showing the depth of complicity by Clinton’s tenure as US Secretary of State and the 2012 Morsi’s election ‘milestone’ in the Egyptian elections. The WikiLeaks revelations of Clinton’s semi-covert connection to the Muslim Brotherhood through her staff at the Department of State, as well as through Huma Abedin, Clinton’s senior adviser are becoming more clear.

leadAP

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in 2012 called the election of Egypt’s Islamist Muslim Brotherhood leader a “milestone” for Egyptian democracy and offered covert police and security help, according to declassified State Department documents, in the van of the WikiLeaks revelations.

Continue reading

How were the polls so wrong?


Two Princeton professors relfect on one of the most unexpected outcomes in presidential election history, one in which nearly every poll got it wrong. Read the full story 

This link gets us there:

http://edition.cnn.com/2016/11/03/opinions/clinton-trump-data-not-drama-wang-zelizer/

That achieved, it’s just two hacks mouthing off, demonstrating the so old cliche that is embarrassing to have to dust off here –

140320115936-julian-zelizer-profile-medium-plus-169Zelizer
garbage in garbage out.

161103123130-sam-wang-medium-plus-169Wang

They are talking in polling cliches, wrapped up their detached elitist bubble, not getting to grips with what Brexit was screaming at them to examine – why the polls were wrong. I’ve already identified that in a previous post.

Their little exercise in self-delusion does not prove polling as such is useless, just that all those wrong Clinton/Trump polls, so limited in their liberal-left horizons and their failure in understanding of the Trump voters, their design, their wording, their analysis, proved useless on this occasion. The liberal arrogance holds that passionately held views are ipso facto the morally right view, the righteous view, and that anything that sustains that delusion is justifiable.

Incompetent/fraudulent pollsters have been getting good money to tell the emperor that the people haven’t noticed he has no clothes.

Until now. Continue reading

US Elections: Vote Shaving , digital rounding and other Shenanigans

A NBC station was caught posting election results showing a Hillary Clinton victory days before the election, fueling concerns that the mainstream media is conditioning the public to accept a rigged election favoring Hillary.
Political activists discovered a hidden web site <http://nesara.news/index.php/busted-here-are-the-complete>  for WRCB out of Chattanooga, Tenn. showing election results with Hillary Clinton securing 343 electoral votes and 42% of the popular vote. 

stolenelectionchattanooga1WRCB
The web site originated from the FTP server of WorldNow, a media software company that provides real-time data – such as election results – and other media assets to local news stations.
The activist who found the page pointed out that the results align well with the “fractional vote” method used by voting machines to rig elections to a predetermined outcome.
“On election day, you will see the same percentages overall, with only the numbers that claim to equal them different,” the activist reported. “The difference in total votes shown on the station pages, with the same overall final percentages proves the election theft is automated to hit desired percentages, no one has to lift a finger during the election itself to accomplish the steal.”

Continue reading